EVIDENCE FOR PRESERVED CARDIOPULMONARY BAROREFLEX CONTROL OF RENAL CORTICAL BLOOD-FLOW IN HUMANS WITH ADVANCED HEART-FAILURE - A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY STUDY
Hr. Middlekauff et al., EVIDENCE FOR PRESERVED CARDIOPULMONARY BAROREFLEX CONTROL OF RENAL CORTICAL BLOOD-FLOW IN HUMANS WITH ADVANCED HEART-FAILURE - A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY STUDY, Circulation, 92(3), 1995, pp. 395-401
Background The effect of cardiopulmonary baroreflexes on the renal cir
culation in healthy humans and patients with heart failure is unknown
because of the technical limitations of studying the renal circulation
. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a new method to measur
e renal cortical blood flow in humans that is precise, rapid, reproduc
ible, and noninvasive. The purpose of this study was to compare the ef
fect of acute cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading by phlebotomy on
regional blood flow in healthy humans and humans with advanced heart f
ailure. Methods and Results We compared renal cortical blood flow and
forearm blood flow in 10 healthy volunteers and 8 patients with heart
failure (left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.24+/-0.02) during cardi
opulmonary baroreceptor unloading with phlebotomy (450 mL). The major
findings of this study are: (1) At rest, renal cortical blood flow is
markedly diminished in humans with heart failure compared with healthy
humans (heart failure, 2.4+/-0.1 versus healthy, 4.3+/-0.2 mL . min(-
1). g(-1), P<.001). (2) In healthy humans, during phlebotomy, forearm
blood flow decreased substantially (basal, 3.3+/-0.4 versus phlebotomy
, 2.6+/-0.3 mL . min(-1). 100 mL(-1), P=.02) and renal cortical blood
flow decreased slightly but significantly (basal, 4.3+/-0.2 versus phl
ebotomy, 4.0+/-0.3 mL . min(-1). g(-1), P=.01). (3) The small magnitud
e of reflex renal vasoconstriction is not explained by the inability o
f the renal circulation to vasoconstrict, since the cold presser stimu
lus induced substantial decreases in renal cortical blood flow in heal
thy subjects (basal, 4.4+/-0.1 versus cold presser, 3.7+/-0.1 mL . min
(-1). g(-1), P=.003). (4) In humans with heart failure, during phlebot
omy, forearm blood flow did not change (basal, 2.6+/-0.3 versus phlebo
tomy, 2.7+/-0.2 mL . min(-1). 100 mL(-1), P=NS), but renal cortical bl
ood flow decreased slightly but significantly (basal, 2.4+/-0.1 versus
phlebotomy, 2.1+/-0.1 mL . min(-1). g(-1), P=.01). (5) The cold press
er stimulus induced substantial decreases in renal cortical blood flow
in patients with heart failure (basal, 2.9+/-0.1 versus cold presser,
2.3+/-0.1 mL . min(-1). g(-1), P=.008). Thus, in patients with heart
failure, there is an abnormality in cardiopulmonary baroreflex control
of the forearm circulation but not the renal circulation. Conclusions
This study demonstrates the power of PET imaging to study normal phys
iological and pathophysiological reflex central of the renal circulati
on in humans and describes the novel finding of selective dysfunction
of cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of one vascular region but its p
reservation in another in patients with heart failure.