Ab. Santos et al., RESEARCH ON FIELD-BASED SERVICES - MODELS FOR REFORM IN THE DELIVERY OF MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE TO POPULATIONS WITH COMPLEX CLINICAL PROBLEMS, The American journal of psychiatry, 152(8), 1995, pp. 1111-1123
Objective: Clinical services for psychiatrically impaired populations
have only recently been studied with scientifically valid designs to e
xplore innovations in structure, accessibility, and financing. Health
systems reform in the United States has provided the impetus for bette
r defining clinically effective and cost-sensitive models for mental h
ealth services. This article reviews assertive community treatment, us
ed for adults with severe mental illnesses, and multisystemic therapy,
used for adolescents with serious emotional disturbances, as examples
of service system innovations that have been studied with controlled
clinical trial designs and have demonstrated efficacy in treating diff
icult and costly clinical populations. Method: The authors reviewed th
e Published controlled clinical trials of assertive community treatmen
t and multisystemic therapy, focusing on the clinical and administrati
ve elements that distinguish them from traditional service systems. Re
sults: A qualitative assessment of these two approaches suggests that
they share common elements, with important implications for mental hea
lth policy. Specifically, the use of an ecological model of behavior a
pplied to mental health patients is critical to both systems. In addit
ion, therapeutic principles emphasizing pragmatic (outcome-oriented) t
reatment approaches, home-based interventions, and individualized goal
s are key elements of their success. Most important, both systems embo
dy a therapeutic philosophy demanding therapist accountability, in whi
ch personnel are rewarded for clinical outcomes and therapeutic innova
tion rather than for following a prescribed plan. Conclusions: As empi
rically tested approaches, assertive community treatment and multisyst
emic therapy provide a scientific foundation for continued reform and
serve to illustrate critical elements in designing new community treat
ment initiatives for behavioral as well as medical conditions.