Dt. Blumstein et A. Bouskila, ASSESSMENT AND DECISION-MAKING IN ANIMALS - A MECHANISTIC MODEL UNDERLYING BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY CAN PREVENT AMBIGUITY, Oikos, 77(3), 1996, pp. 569-576
Understanding how animals make decisions is a fundamental question in
behavioral ecology which has cascading effects on how animals respond
to environmental variation. An explicit model of the mechanisms of inf
ormation processing and decision making can help prevent conflated def
initions and ambiguous interpretations. Unambiguous definitions are cr
ucial for clear communication between theoreticians and empiricists an
d for the rapid advancement of studies of decision making, Moreover, e
mploying a clear model of underlying proximal processes will help brid
ge the gap between cognitive psychology and behavioral ecology and sho
uld aid scientific advancement. We present a simple model to guide stu
dies of assessment and decision making. According to the model, indivi
duals assess perceived stimuli and evaluate them for useful informatio
n. The association between perceived stimuli and evaluated information
involves ''assessment rules''. Based on evaluated information, indivi
duals can employ trade-offs and make decisions. The association betwee
n the result of assessment and observed behavior involves ''decision r
ules''. The model clearly emphasizes that the study of decision rules
requires knowledge of the results of assessment, and we acknowledge th
e difficulty of studying assessment, However, without this knowledge,
we can only study decision rules when we assume assessment rules betwe
en subjects are identical (i.e., with a uniform group of subjects). Th
e simple model can be used to structure the design and interpretation
of studies of assessment and decision making and help theoreticians an
d empiricists work together to understand behavioral flexibility.