PROGRESSION TO STEROID AUTONOMY IS ACCOMPANIED BY ALTERED SENSITIVITYTO GROWTH-FACTORS IN S115 MOUSE MAMMARY-TUMOR CELLS

Citation
Rj. Daly et al., PROGRESSION TO STEROID AUTONOMY IS ACCOMPANIED BY ALTERED SENSITIVITYTO GROWTH-FACTORS IN S115 MOUSE MAMMARY-TUMOR CELLS, Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 54(1-2), 1995, pp. 21-29
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,"Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
09600760
Volume
54
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
21 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-0760(1995)54:1-2<21:PTSAIA>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Progression to steroid autonomy is a major clinical problem in the tre atment of steroid-sensitive tumours. Molecular mechanisms remain unkno wn but recent hypotheses imply a role for growth factors in this progr ession. Since S115 + A androgen-responsive mouse mammary tumour cells provide a model system to study this phenomenon in vitro, we have used this model to investigate growth factor gene expression and sensitivi ty during progression from a steroid sensitive to insensitive state. S 115 + A androgen-responsive cells showed a positive proliferative resp onse, morphological response and increased saturation density to vario us forms of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and transforming growth fac tor beta (TGF beta) in both monolayer and suspension culture. A marked synergy was noted, however, between FGF and TGF beta in promoting gro wth in suspension culture. S115 + A cells possessed mRNA for both acid ic FGF (aFGF) and TGF beta(1), both of which were increased by testost erone. Progression to androgen insensitivity was associated with a rev ersal of growth factor response such that all growth factor responses became generally inhibitory on growth of the unresponsive cells but wi th a particularly striking synergistic action between FGF and TGF beta (1) on inhibition of both monolayer and suspension growth. Levels of a FGF and TGF beta(1) mRNAs remained low in steroid-insensitive S115 - A cells, indicating that loss of response was not associated with any c onstitutive upregulation of endogenous production of one of these grow th factors. The scientific and clinical implications are discussed.