Do. Bates et al., THE EFFECT OF HOSIERY ON INTERSTITIAL FLUID PRESSURE AND ARM VOLUME FLUCTUATIONS IN BREAST-CANCER RELATED ARM EDEMA, Phlebology, 10(2), 1995, pp. 46-50
Objectives: (1) To measure interstitial fluid pressure under one brand
of hosiery in arm lymphoedema. (2) To assess the stability of the swe
lling over various time scales. Setting: Human microvascular studies l
aboratory of a teaching hospital. Subjects: Patients with arm oedema f
ollowing successful breast cancer treatment. Main outcome measures: (1
) Arm volume calculations using multiple circumferential measurements
by tape measure. (2) Interstitial fluid pressure measurements by wick-
in-needle technique in subcutis. Results: The mean swollen arm was 33%
greater in volume than the contralateral arm (n = 50). There was no s
ignificant correlation between the size of the arm and the duration of
the swelling. There was no significant change in arm volume over 2 we
eks (n = 8) but there was a small (50 ml), significant increase overni
ght (p < 0.05). The mean (SD) interstitial fluid pressure while wearin
g one brand of hosiery (Sigvaris) was 18.7 (5.8) cmH(2)O compared with
1.2 (2.8) cmH(2)O after its removal. There was a significant correlat
ion between the pressure under the sleeve and the pressure without the
sleeve (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The Sigvaris sleeve exerts
sufficient compression to underlying tissue to raise interstitial flui
d pressure. This may control arm swelling by reducing fluid filtration
rate and/or raising fluid drainage rate from the arm.