REPLY TO THE COMMENT ON THE TRANSCENDENTAL METHOD

Using an unconventional mathematical approach and analysis of the prec ision of solution by a new formula for the representation of number in the transcendental method, we indicate that the objection given in th e comment most probably shows a lack of understanding and misapprehens ion. Undoubtedly, the transcendental equation of the neutron slowing d own has an analytical closed-form solution. This solution is exact acc ording to the new closed-form representation of numbers with the desir ed accuracy. The numerical results, obtained for different magnitudes of the transcendental parameter B(u), support the validity and basic p rinciples of the transcendental method.