C. Abraira et al., VETERANS AFFAIRS COOPERATIVE STUDY ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND COMPLICATIONS IN TYPE-II DIABETES (VA CSDM) - RESULTS OF THE FEASIBILITY TRIAL, Diabetes care, 18(8), 1995, pp. 1113-1123
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
OBJECTIVE - It is not clear whether intensive pharmacological therapy
can be effectively sustained in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitu
s (NIDDM). The relative risks and benefits of intensive insulin therap
y in NIDDM are not well defined. Accordingly, we designed a feasibilit
y study that compared standard therapy and intensive therapy in a grou
p of NIDDM men who required insulin due to sustained hyperglycemia. RE
SEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A prospective trial was conducted in five
medical centers in 153 men of 60 +/- 6 years of age age who had a know
n diagnosis of diabetes for 7.8 +/- 4 years. They were randomly assign
ed to a standard insulin treatment group (one morning injection per da
y) or to an intensive therapy group designed to attain near-normal gly
cemia and a clinically significant separation of glycohemoglobin from
the standard arm. A four-step plan was used in the intensive therapy g
roup along with daily self-monitoring of glucose: 1) an evening insuli
n injection, 2) the same injection adding daytime glipizide, 3) two in
jections of insulin alone, and 4) multiple daily injections. Patient a
ccrual and adherence, glycohemoglobin (HbA(1c)), side effects, and mea
surements of endpoints for a prospective long-term trial were assessed
. RESULTS - Accrual goals were met, mean follow-up time was 27 months
(range 18-35 months), and patients kept 98.6% of scheduled visits. Aft
er 6 months, the mean HbA(1c) in the intensive therapy group was at or
below 7.3% and remained 2% lower than the standard group for the dura
tion of the trial. Most of the decrease in the mean HbA(1c) in the int
ensive group was the obtained by a single injection of evening interme
diate insulin, alone or with daytime glipizide. By the end of the tria
l, 64% of the patients had advanced to two or more injections of insul
in a day, aiming for normal HbAlc. However, only a small additional fa
ll in HbA(1c) was attained. Severe hypoglycemia was rare (two events p
er 100 patients per year) and not significantly different between the
groups, nor were changes in weight, blood pressure, or plasma lipids.
There were 61 new cardiovascular events in 40 patients and 10 deaths (
6 due to cardiovascular causes). CONCLUSIONS - Intense stepped insulin
therapy in NIDDM patients who have failed glycemic control on pharmac
ological therapy is effective in maintaining near-normal glycemic cont
rol for >2 years without excessive severe hypoglycemia, weight gain, h
ypertension, or dyslipidemia. Cardiovascular event rates are high at t
his stage of NIDDM. A long-term prospective trial is needed to assess
the risk-benefit ratio oi intensified treatment of hyperglycemia in NI
DDM patients requiring insulin.