SOURCES OF VARIABILITY IN THE HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY - APOPULATION-BASED STUDY

Citation
Kl. Radack et al., SOURCES OF VARIABILITY IN THE HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY - APOPULATION-BASED STUDY, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 26(1), 1995, pp. 26-36
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Genetics & Heredity
ISSN journal
08936692
Volume
26
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
26 - 36
Database
ISI
SICI code
0893-6692(1995)26:1<26:SOVITH>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The cytokinesis block method was used to examine the intraclass correl ation coefficient of the human lymphocyte micronucleus assay, sources of variability, and practical issues regarding he number of samples pe r subject. Twenty samples of 100 binucleate cells from a single phlebo tomy per subject were analyzed (n = 112), using methods to evaluate va riance components. The results showed marked intraindividual (sampling error) variation greeter than interindividual variation, and no betwe en-group contribution to the total variance. The intraclass correlatio n was 41.6%, indicating that slightly greater than half of the total v ariation in micronucleus outcomes was due to error variance (i.e., 58. 4%). After adjusting for age, the intraclass correlation coefficient d ecreased trivially from 41.6% to 39.8%. There was a strong differentia l gender effect, favoring a greater micronuclei frequency in women. In conclusion, the data suggest that most of the variability in our data set for the micronucleus assay was due to sampling error; a strong di fferential gender effect favoring females was also verified. Equally i mportant, in terms of practical applications, our analysis of the appr opriate number of samples per subject revealed that scoring greater th an 1,000 cells (10 determinations per subject) yielded no substantial improvement in statistical sensitivity, compared to the traditional 20 determinations. We suggest that more attention should be directed tow ard improving the assay's utility, while reducing sampling error. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.