S. Safrin et al., A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 3 METHODS OF ANTIVIRAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CLINICAL HERPES-SIMPLEX VIRUS ISOLATES, Clinical and diagnostic virology, 4(1), 1995, pp. 81-91
Background: Current methods of antiviral susceptibility testing for he
rpes simplex virus (HSV) are poorly standardized and have rarely been
compared critically. Objectives: To compare the three most commonly ut
ilized HSV susceptibility assays for accuracy of result, method of imp
lementation, and time required. Study design: We compared susceptibili
ty results for acyclovir and foscarnet using the plaque reduction, dye
uptake and DNA hybridization assays in 30 patient isolates of HSV, of
varying susceptibility pattern. Compared parameters included: values
for ID50 (the concentration of drug required to inhibit virus growth b
y 50% or more), ratio of ID90 to ID50, and correlation of susceptibili
ty result with clinical response to antiviral therapy, when available.
In addition, we compared ease of the assay, presence of objective end
point, time required to generate the susceptibility result, and necess
ary equipment for implementation. Results: The dye uptake yielded ID50
results that were approximately two-fold greater than those from the
plaque reduction assay, while ID50 values from the DNA hybridization a
ssay were one-half those from the plaque reduction assay. Comparison o
f the correlation of susceptibility result with clinical response to a
cyclovir therapy in 17 instances and to foscarnet therapy in 10 instan
ces suggested the possibility of a somewhat greater discriminative abi
lity of the dye uptake assay, and a somewhat lesser discriminative abi
lity of the DNA hybridization assay, when compared with results from t
he plaque reduction assay in isolates with borderline acyclovir suscep
tibility. Conclusions: Larger comparative studies are necessary to fur
ther differences in discriminative ability of the three assays for HSV
. All three assays were deemed suboptimal due to an overly long turnar
ound time, associated expense, and/or level of equipment required for
their performance. Continued evaluation of alternative, more rapid ass
ays is therefore warranted.