CELLULAR PROLIFERATION AND INFILTRATION FOLLOWING INTERSTITIAL IRRADIATION OF NORMAL DOG BRAIN IS ALTERED BY AN INHIBITOR OF POLYAMINE SYNTHESIS

Citation
Jr. Fike et al., CELLULAR PROLIFERATION AND INFILTRATION FOLLOWING INTERSTITIAL IRRADIATION OF NORMAL DOG BRAIN IS ALTERED BY AN INHIBITOR OF POLYAMINE SYNTHESIS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 32(4), 1995, pp. 1035-1045
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
32
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1035 - 1045
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1995)32:4<1035:CPAIFI>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Purpose: The objectives of this study were to quantitatively define pr oliferative and infiltrative cell responses after focal I-125 irradiat ion of normal brain, and to determine the effects of an intravenous in fusion of alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) on those responses. Met hods and Materials: Adult beagle dogs were irradiated using high activ ity I-125 sources. Saline (control) or DFMO (150 mg/kg/day) was infuse d for 18 days starting 2 days before irradiation. At varying times up to 8 weeks after irradiation, brain tissues were collected and the cel l responses in and around the focal lesion were quantified. Immunohist ochemical stains were used to label astrocytes (GFAP), vascular endoth elial cells (Factor VIII), polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs; MAC 387 ) and cells synthesizing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (BrdU). Cellular responses were quantified using a histomorphometric analysis.Results: After radiation alone, cellular events included a substantial acute in flammatory response followed by increased BrdU labeling and progressiv e increases in numbers of capillaries and astrocytes. alpha-Difluorome thylornithine treatment significantly affected the measured cell respo nses. As in controls, an early inflammatory response was measured, but after 2 weeks there were more PMNs/unit area than in controls. The on set of measurable BrdU labeling was delayed in DFMO-treated animals, a nd the magnitude of labeling was significantly reduced. Increases in a strocyte and vessel numbers/mm(2) were observed after a 2-week delay. At the site of implant, astrocytes from DFMO-treated dogs were signifi cantly smaller than those from controls. Conclusions: There is substan tial cell proliferation and infiltration in response to interstitial i rradiation of normal brain, and these responses are significantly alte red by DFMO treatment. Although the precise mechanisms by which DPMO e xerts its effects in this model are not known, the results from this s tudy suggest that modification of radiation injury may be possible by manipulating the response of normal cells to injury.