Sparse data are available concerning the survival rate of porcelain in
lays or onlays to inform the dentist and address the expectations of p
atients, A total of 25 posterior porcelain inlays were inserted by two
dentists at a private Danish clinic; the time elapsed since cementati
on was 20 to 57 months (average 40.4 months). Tooth preparations for M
OD porcelain inlays were completed for 13 premolars and 12 molars but
most did not include cuspal coverage. All inlays were constructed at t
he same commercial dental laboratory and according to the manufacturer
's recommendations; they were etched and treated with silane before th
ey were cemented. The cementation included etching of cavosurface enam
el and treatment of the dentin with a dentinal bonding system. A thin
layer of composite resin luting agent was applied to the tooth prepara
tion before the porcelain inlays were cemented. The first 10 porcelain
inlays were cemented with a light-curing composite resin cement and t
he remaining 11 with a dual curing composite resin cement. Twelve of t
he 25 porcelain inlays failed and were replaced during the observation
period. Ten failures were due to a fracture of the inlay, one was cau
sed by secondary caries, and the final failure was attributed to a mar
ginal gap between the inlay and proximal tooth surface. Porcelain inla
ys cemented with light curing composite resin exhibited more failures
(p = 0.05) than those cemented with dual-curing composite resin. In ad
dition, more failures (p = 0.07) were recorded among inlays inserted i
n molars than among those in premolars.