A. Skaff et al., CORNEAL SWELLING AND RECOVERY FOLLOWING WEAR OF THICK HYDROGEL CONTACT-LENSES IN INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETICS, Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 15(4), 1995, pp. 287-297
Thick, 0.34 mm, 38% water hydrogel lenses were fitted, under a pressur
e patch, to one eye of 18 type I diabetic patients (aged 18-40 years)
to assess the acute response to hypoxia and hypercapnia; the response
was compared with that in 18 healthy, aged-matched nondiabetic subject
s; the closed-eye lens wear was started mid-morning. Pre-lens wear ass
essments were made of acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corn
eal thickness (CCT) and corneal appearance by biomicroscopy. The mean
duration of the diabetes was 13 +/- 7 years and the average fasting bl
ood glucose was 8.7 +/- 3.3 mM l(-1) Baseline CCT values were marginal
ly greater in diabetic patients (600 +/- 33 mu m) compared with a grou
p of non-diabetic control subjects (584 +/- 26 mu m; P > 0.5). A 7.7 /- 2.1 % increase in CCT was measured after 3 h lens wear in the diabe
tic patients while an average 10.6 +/- 2.4 % increase in CCT was measu
red in the control subjects (P < 0.05). The recovery of corneal thickn
ess to baseline values in diabetic patients was slower (at 44.8 +/- 2.
0 % per hour) than the control subjects (53.9 +/- 2.1 per hour; P < 0.
05) although recovery of corneal thickness occurred in both groups wit
hin 2.5-3 h. IOP values (non-contact tonometry) were higher in the dia
betic patients than in the controls (14.5 +/- 2.9 vs 12.4 +/- 1.7 mmHg
; P < 0.01). Overall, those corneas with greater baseline CCT values t
ended to swell less than those with lower baseline CCT values (r = 0.5
82). Positive correlations were also found between corneal thickness a
nd IOP and blood glucose. The diabetic patients thus tended to have sl
ightly thicker corneas (but this could be related to blood glucose or
IOP rather than true corneal disease) and also had corneas that tended
to swell less with a contact lens stress test (but this could be cons
titutively due to the slight oedema already present). The different co
rneal response in diabetic patients may thus be the result of physical
determinants such as initial oedema and IOP and not the result of a d
isease of the cornea itself.