POSTCRANIAL ESTIMATES OF BODY-WEIGHT IN PROCONSUL, WITH A NOTE ON A DISTAL TIBIA OF P-MAJOR FROM NAPAK, UGANDA

Citation
Kl. Rafferty et al., POSTCRANIAL ESTIMATES OF BODY-WEIGHT IN PROCONSUL, WITH A NOTE ON A DISTAL TIBIA OF P-MAJOR FROM NAPAK, UGANDA, American journal of physical anthropology, 97(4), 1995, pp. 391-402
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Anthropology,"Art & Humanities General",Mathematics,"Biology Miscellaneous
ISSN journal
00029483
Volume
97
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
391 - 402
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9483(1995)97:4<391:PEOBIP>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
A distal tibia of Proconsul major from Napak, Uganda, is described, It is morphologically similar to other Proconsul tibiae, only much large r in size. This specimen and others are used to estimate the body weig ht of P, major from postcrania for the first time. Body weight is pred icted from articular and diaphyseal dimensions using regression equati ons derived from a modern comparative sample of catarrhine primates, T he estimated body weight of P, major based on the Napak tibia is 86.7 kg, whereas two other P. major specimens are smaller, giving a total r ange of 63.4-86.7 kg and an average of 75.1 kg. The regression equatio ns are also used to predict the body weight of specimens from Rusinga/ Mfangano belonging to P. nyanzae and P. heseloni, As the body weight e stimates generated here are consistent with previous postcranial-based estimates for Proconsul species, the two sets of estimates are pooled to give means of 10.9 kg for P. heseloni (n = 6) and 35.6 kg for P, n yanzae (n = 12). These findings support the traditional assignment of two species at Rusinga/Mfangano. The postcranial body weight estimates for the three species of Proconsul are compared to body weights estim ated from M(1) area in order to investigate possible differences in sc aling between the teeth and limbs in these species. Despite being base d on a smaller sample size, the postcranial estimates clearly differen tiate the three taxa, whereas the dental estimates form a more continu ous distribution, Molar area overestimates body weight in P. heseloni, indicating that it is megadont compared to a large sample of modern a nthropoid primates. In contrast, molar area underestimates body weight in P. nyanzae and especially P. major, suggesting relative microdonty in these taxa. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.