TANDEM AUTOTRANSPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER

Citation
Er. Broun et al., TANDEM AUTOTRANSPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER, Journal of clinical oncology, 13(8), 1995, pp. 2050-2055
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
0732183X
Volume
13
Issue
8
Year of publication
1995
Pages
2050 - 2055
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(1995)13:8<2050:TAFTTO>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the tolerability and impact on progression-fre e and overall survival of two consecutive cycles of high-dose chemothe rapy (HDC) with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in patie nts with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer. Patients and M ethods: Twenty-eight patients received conventional-dose induction the rapy (ITx) followed by a planned two cycles of HDC with ABMT. Median a ge was 45 years (range, 34 to 60 years). Sites of disease were bone (s even patients), visceral (three), soft tissue (11), multiple (six), an d CNS (one). The ITx regimens of cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorub icin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), methotrexate, fluorouracil, p rednisone, and tamoxifen (CAMFTP) (three patients); fluorouracil, doxo rubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAG; 11 patients); cyclophosphamide, me thotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF; four patients); or doxorubicin or m itoxantrone/cyclophosphamide (10 patients) were given to maximum respo nse (three to five cycles). HDC was cyclophosphamide 6 g/m(2), carbopl atin 2 g/m(2), and etoposide 625 mg/m(2) with ABMT. Results: Of 28 pat ients, 24 received two (86%) cycles of HDC. Four received only one cyc le due to persistent toxicity from course 1 (one patient), no response to course 1 (two), and death on course 1 (one). Grade 3 to 4 nonhemat ologic toxicities included mucositis (in one or both cycles in 21 of 2 8 patients; 75%), diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Reversible periphera l neuropathy wets seen in 15 of 28 patients and was severe in one. Doc umented infections were seen in 19 of 52 cycles. There was one transpl ant-related death. Six patients were converted from partial remission (PR) to complete remission (CR) with HDC; two of 24 patients (8%) were converted from PR to CR with the second cycle of HDC. Progression-fre e survival rate is nine of 28 patients (32%) with median follow-up of 23 months (range, 13 to 36+ months). Eighteen of 28 patients (64%) hav e progressed at I to 17 months from ABMT. Conclusion: Two cycles of HD C with ABMT wets well tolerated with ct high response rate in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The importance of the second cycle of HDC in this population is unclear. (C) 1995 by American society of Cli nical Oncology.