A COMPARISON OF FRONTAL ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK TRAINING, TRAPEZIUS ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK TRAINING, AND PROGRESSIVE MUSCLE-RELAXATION THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF TENSION HEADACHE
Jg. Arena et al., A COMPARISON OF FRONTAL ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK TRAINING, TRAPEZIUS ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC BIOFEEDBACK TRAINING, AND PROGRESSIVE MUSCLE-RELAXATION THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF TENSION HEADACHE, Headache, 35(7), 1995, pp. 411-419
This study is the first systematic examination of a trapezius EMG biof
eedback training regimen with tension headache sufferers. It evaluated
the differential effects of three psychophysiological treatments for
tension headache: (1) a standard 12-session frontal EMG biofeedback tr
aining regimen (n=8), (2) a 12-session upper trapezius EMG biofeedback
training regimen (n=10). and (3) a standard seven-session progressive
muscle relaxation therapy regimen (n=8). Posttreatment assessment at
3 months following cessation of treatment revealed clinically signific
ant decreases in overall headache activity (50% or greater) in 50% of
subjects in the frontal biofeedback group, 100% in the trapezius biofe
edback group, and 37.5% in the relaxation therapy group. Chi-squared a
nalyses indicated that the trapezius biofeedback group was more effect
ive in obtaining significant clinical improvement than the frontal bio
feedback and relaxation therapy groups (which did not differ from each
other). The three treatments did not differ on secondary measures of
headache improvement (number of headache-free days, peak headache acti
vity, and medication index). Implications for the psychophysiological
treatment of tension headache, as well as future research directions,
are discussed.