As. Shoker et al., THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF ALLOANTIGEN-BLOCKING ANTIBODIES ON UNPRIMED AND MEMORY T-HELPER CELLS, Transplantation, 60(2), 1995, pp. 184-191
Responsiveness to recall antigens by memory and naive T helper cells i
s different. To study whether such a difference is also applicable to
affinity for allorecognition, we analyzed the effect of an IgG MLR blo
cking antibody separated from sera of patients with known kidney trans
plant chronic rejection on primed and unprimed CD4(+) T cell alloreact
ivity. The results show that addition of the IgG fraction inhibits the
patient's own unprimed T helper cell responses to a panel of four dif
ferent alloantigens as well as a third-party mixed lymphocyte response
. The same IgG fraction inhibited third-party naive T helper cell, but
not autologous unprimed T helper cell, proliferation to adherent anti
-CD3 antibody, which suggests that the mechanism of inhibitory action
of the IgG is allogeneic-dependent. This IgG also did not induce inhib
ition of any of the T helper cell clone responsiveness, raised from th
e same or other patients, when stimulated with the same alloantigens u
sed for unprimed cell alloactivation. Differential responses of naive
and memory CD4(+) T cells to alloantigens may explain some differences
between the in vivo and in vitro systems and why allograft rejection
can proceed in the presence of allogeneic blocking antibodies.