The suggestion is made that emotions organized on a preconceptual leve
l are psychic constructs different in kind, as well as degree, from em
otions organized on a more abstract conceptual level. For many people
the regressive alteration in ego functioning that gives rise to these
emotional constructions represents a characterological way of handling
conflict. Emotions organized on a preconceptual level and rigidly mai
ntained through primitive defenses ward off a host of fears ranging fr
om castration to dedifferentiation. The shift from the preconceptual w
orld of sensation to the conceptual world of abstraction complements t
he resolution of oedipal themes and is essential for free and easy mov
ement between reality-based interactions and the imaginary experience
of both self- and object representations in the transference. Structur
al and dynamic aspects of these emotional constructions are discussed
and their relation to a person's experience of reality is explored thr
ough transference material taken from different points in an analysis.
The problem of the analyst's use of concepts to refer to preconcepts
is also discussed, as is the issue of enactments.