FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL ON ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL CONDUCTION IN GUINEA-PIG ISOLATED HEART - MECHANISMS AND POTENTIAL ANTIDYSRHYTMIC PROPERTIES
Rs. Alphin et al., FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL ON ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL CONDUCTION IN GUINEA-PIG ISOLATED HEART - MECHANISMS AND POTENTIAL ANTIDYSRHYTMIC PROPERTIES, Anesthesiology, 83(2), 1995, pp. 382-394
Background: The use of propofol has been associated with episodes of b
radycardias. The mechanism(s) underlying these phenomena are not well
defined. Therefore we investigated (1) the chronotropic and dromotropi
c effects of propofol, (2) the frequency-dependent effects of propofol
on the atrioventicular (AV) node, and (3) the physiologic mechanism(s
) underlying propofol's effects on AV nodal conduction. Methods: Guine
a pig isolated, perfused hearts were instrumented for measurement of a
trial rate and AV nodal conduction time In spontaneously beating harts
, or stimulus-to-His bundle (S-H) intervals in atrially paced hearts.
In addition, the Wenckebach cycle length, effective refractory period
and S-H interval prolongation to an abrupt increase in pacing rate wer
e measured to further define propofol's dromotropic effects and freque
ncy-dependent behavior. Results: Propofol, in a concentration-dependen
t manner, (1) slowed atrial rate and AV nodal conduction time in spont
aneously beating hearts, (2) prolonged the S-H interval in atrially pa
ced hearts, and (3) prolonged Wenckebach cycle length and effective re
fractory period. The negative dromotropic effect of propofol was great
er during atrial pacing than in spontaneously beating hearts. Furtherm
ore, this effect was enhanced at faster pacing rates, indicating frequ
ency-dependent behavior. Atropine significantly antagonized propofol-i
nduced S-H interval prolongation. The results of competition binding s
tudies also supported a M(2)-muscarinic receptor-mediated mechanism. C
onclusions: We conclude that in the Isolated guinea pig heart, propofo
l slows atrial rate and depresses AV nodal conduction in a concentrati
on-dependent manner. The negative dromotropic effect of propofol shows
frequency dependence and is predominantly mediated by M(2)-muscarinic
receptors, Given the marked rate dependence of propofol's AV nodal ac
tions, this anesthetic agent may impart antidysrhythmic protection to
those patients susceptible to supraventricular tachycardias.