Analysis of British Crime Survey data confirmed that area differences
in crime incidence are attributable to both differences in victim prev
alence (number of victims per respondent) and differences in the conce
ntration of victimization (number of victimizations per victim). The p
aper extends the analysis to changes in victimization over time, compa
ring the 1982 and 1988 British Crime Surveys. It was found that proper
ty Grime had become more unequally distributed across parliamentary co
nstituencies, the change being attributable more to changes in concent
ration than to victim prevalence. The pattern was much less marked for
personal crime. Changes in crime incidence varied greatly by region,
though there was evidence of redistribution of victimization between N
orthern and Southern regions. The analysis not only illustrates the im
portance of diaggregating crime trends into indices of prevalence and
concentration but also points to the possible relationship between sub
-national crime trends and processes of economic and social regionaliz
ation.