R. Reisenzein, ON OATLEY AND JOHNSON-LAIRDS THEORY OF EMOTION AND HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES IN THE AFFECTIVE LEXICON, Cognition and emotion, 9(4), 1995, pp. 383-416
The semantic theory of emotion words recently proposed by Johnson-Lair
d and Oatley (1989) was empirically investigated in three studies. In
all three studies, I assessed, for different samples of German nonbasi
c emotion words: (a) subjects' judgements of the conditional probabili
ty of experiencing basic emotions, given the experience of nonbasic on
es; and (b) their beliefs about whether it is possible to experience n
onbasic emotions without also experiencing basic emotions. In Study 1,
I examined the proposed semantic relations between 48 nonbasic and th
eir defining basic emotion words. as well as 14 of the proposed semant
ic relations among nonbasic emotion words. In Study 2, these tests wer
e repeated using object-focused test sentences. In Study 3, the semant
ically based relations among 12 emotions were compared to all of the n
onsemantic relations existing among these emotions, and the theory was
additionally tested by examining self-ascriptions of emotion words in
concrete situations (hypothetical scenarios). I found that (1) the se
mantic theory of emotion words proposed by Johnson-Laird and Oatley (1
989) was consistently unsupported for the disgust-derivatives, and tha
t in a substantial number of cases a second nonbasic emotion was nearl
y as prominent as the modal one (Study 1); (2) the conditional probabi
lity and possibility relations between allegedly semantically connecte
d emotion pairs were frequently no stronger or even weaker than those
between semantically unconnected ones (Studies 1, 3); (3) in terms of
absolute judgements, the data fell considerably short of the theoretic
ally predicted results (all studies), particularly when (4) object-foc
used emotion words were used (Study 2); and (5) no more favourable res
ults were obtained when subjects' self-ascriptions of emotion words in
concrete situations were examined (Study 3). These findings call in q
uestion Johnson-Laird and Oatley's semantic theory of emotion words an
d potentially also their theory of emotions.