Y. Nishimura et al., THERMORADIOTHERAPY OF SUPERFICIAL AND SUBSURFACE TUMORS - ANALYSIS OFTHERMAL PARAMETERS AND TUMOR RESPONSE, International journal of hyperthermia, 11(5), 1995, pp. 603-613
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging",Oncology
Between 1988 and 1993, 57 superficial and subsurface tumours of variou
s tumour type were treated with a 430-MHz microwave heating device. Me
an (range) tumour depth of the 57 tumours was 3.0 (0.5-6.5) cm. Fifty-
four tumours were treated with thermoradiotherapy. Total radiation dos
e ranged from 20 to 70 Gy with a mean of 53 Gy. For the remaining thre
e tumours, thermochemotherapy was performed. Hyperthermia was given on
ce a week, and a total of 207 heat sessions was administered. Our goal
of hyperthermia treatment was to elevate all monitored tumour points
> 41 degrees C for > 30 min. The mean (range) number of intratumoral t
hermometry points was 3.7 (2-6). The goal of hyperthermia treatment wa
s achieved in 49% of the sessions. At the time of maximum tumour regre
ssion, complete response was noted in 53% of the tumours treated with
thermoradiotherapy. Univariate analysis demonstrated that parameters i
ncluding tumour type (breast cancer versus others), tumour depth, mini
mum tumour temperature, average tumour temperature, minimum equivalent
time at 43 degrees C, and number of heat sessions achieving the treat
ment goal significantly affected the tumour response of the combined t
reatment, while total radiation dose and number of heat sessions were
not significant factors for tumour response. Multivariate logistic ana
lysis revealed that only tumour depth ( < 3 versus greater than or equ
al to 3 cm) was a significant prognostic factor for tumour response (p
= 0.029). Tumour type (breast cancer versus others) and a number of h
eat sessions achieving the treatment goal (0-1 versus 2-5) were found
to be of borderline significance in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.0
75 and 0.097 respectively). The number of heat sessions achieving a mi
nimum tumour temperature of > 41 degrees C for > 30 min seems a practi
cal thermal parameter that influences tumour response. The present stu
dy indicates the importance of quality and quantity of heat session on
the treatment outcome of thermoradiotherapy.