Pd. Kroboth et al., TRIAZOLAM PHARMACOKINETICS AFTER INTRAVENOUS, ORAL, AND SUBLINGUAL ADMINISTRATION, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 15(4), 1995, pp. 259-262
This study was designed to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavail
ability of triazolam, 0.25 mg, after the administration of the markete
d oral tablet and a sublingual prototype wafer; an intravenous dose wa
s used as a reference, Twelve men were evaluated in a three-way crosso
ver study; study days were separated by 1 week, A single dose was admi
nistered to each subject at approximately 8 a.m.; serial blood samples
were obtained for the determination of triazolam concentration, The f
raction absorbed relative to intravenous was 20% higher in the subling
ual than in the oral treatment (p = 0.0128); the difference between tr
eatments was greatest in the first 2 hours as indicated by the area un
der the curve from 0 to 2 hours (p < 0.05). The extraction ratio range
d from 0.05 to 0.25, and the predicted availability after oral adminis
tration was 86% with a range of 75 to 95%. In contrast, the observed m
ean absolute availability was 44% (oral) and 53% (sublingual). A poten
tial explanation for this discrepancy between predicted and observed b
ioavailability is that after oral administration, a fraction of triazo
lam may be metabolized by cytochrome P450IIIA4 in the gut wall, with a
separate fraction subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver, Alth
ough this study was not designed to identify sites of triazolam metabo
lism, the proposed explanation is consistent with the occurrence of P4
50IIIA4 in the stomach, small intestine, and liver, Doses administered
sublingually avoid first-pass metabolism, producing earlier and highe
r peak concentrations than do doses administered orally.