Eg. Daoud et al., INCIDENCE OF IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATOR DISCHARGES AFTER CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION IN SURVIVORS OF ISCHEMIC SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH, The American heart journal, 130(2), 1995, pp. 277-280
Coronary revascularization has been suggested as sole therapy for seco
ndary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest associated with ischemia. Th
e use of implantable defibrillators (ICD) in combination with coronary
revascularization for this patient population is unclear. Among 412 c
onsecutive patients receiving an ICD, 23 (6%) were identified as sudde
n cardiac arrest survivors who were noninducible with programmed stimu
lation and had unstable angina or ischemia on a functional study; they
underwent successful coronary revascularization. During a follow-up o
f 34 +/- 18 months, 10 (43%) of the 23 patients received ICD shocks (8
+/- 8 per patient, range 1 to 22 shocks), and nine of the 10 patients
had syncope/presyncope associated with at least one ICD discharge. Pa
tients with ICD discharges were compared with those without ICD discha
rges, and no clinical characteristics were statistically different bet
ween the two groups. In conclusion, revascularization alone may be ina
dequate therapy for survivors of sudden cardiac arrest associated with
ischemia who are noninducible with programmed stimulation, and clinic
al variables cannot predict which patients are likely to have recurren
t malignant ventricular arrhythmias.