SCHISTOSOMA-HAEMATOBIUM IN THE BABOON (PAPIO-ANUBIS) - ASSESSMENT OF PROTECTION LEVELS AGAINST EITHER A SINGLE MASS CHALLENGE OR REPEATED TRICKLE CHALLENGES AFTER VACCINATION WITH IRRADIATED SCHISTOSOMULA
Gdf. Reid et al., SCHISTOSOMA-HAEMATOBIUM IN THE BABOON (PAPIO-ANUBIS) - ASSESSMENT OF PROTECTION LEVELS AGAINST EITHER A SINGLE MASS CHALLENGE OR REPEATED TRICKLE CHALLENGES AFTER VACCINATION WITH IRRADIATED SCHISTOSOMULA, Journal of Helminthology, 69(2), 1995, pp. 139-147
Baboons vaccinated intramuscularly with three times 9000 20 krad irrad
iated Schistosoma haematobium schistosomula at monthly intervals were
exposed percutaneously to either a single mass challenge of 3000 (VMC)
or ten, weekly trickle challenges of 300 (VTC) normal S. haematobium
cercariae. Unvaccinated mass (MCC) or trickle (TCC) challenge controls
were exposed simultaneously. Faecal and urine egg production was dela
yed in the vaccinated groups which also had reduced adult, particularl
y female, worm recoveries. Total faecal, urine and tissue eggs were lo
wer in the vaccinated groups, as also were the size of granulomata and
the gross pathology and severity of inflammatory responses in the bla
dder and ureters, except for an increased proportion of tissue eggs in
the livers of vaccinated animals. Differences in pathology between gr
oups were less marked in the other organs. Most indices were reduced i
n the trickle versus the mass challenge control groups. Some of these
trends were statistically significant, mostly in the trickle vaccinati
on group (VTC), but others were not. Compared with the appropriate unv
accinated controls, the percentage reduction for the trickle challenge
(VTC) group (73%) was three times greater than that of the mass chall
enge (VMC) group (23%). Overall, the protective effect of vaccination
was more clearly demonstrated in the trickle than in the mass challeng
e groups. This conclusion is based on a single experiment. Nevertheles
s, because trickle infections probably approximate more closely to wha
t humans receive naturally, it is recommended that they should be used
for future testing of all potential vaccines in baboons.