The ability of personnel test item response latencies to differentiate
between individuals instructed to fake and those instructed to respon
d honestly was examined. Based on a general model of lying derived fro
m schema theory, it was predicted that fakers should take relatively l
onger than honest respondents to admit to delinquent characteristics c
oncerning themselves. Discriminant function analysis indicated that re
sponse latencies to items on standard personnel tests could significan
tly distinguish between fakers and honest test respondents in a person
nel testing scenario. Results generalized across samples of students a
nd unemployed job seekers and were interpreted as supporting a general
model of lying. Implications are discussed.