MODULATION OF VASCULAR CONTRACTILE RESPONSES TO ALPHA(1)-ADRENERGIC AND ALPHA(2)-ADRENERGIC AND NEUROPEPTIDE-Y RECEPTOR STIMULATION IN RATSWITH ISCHEMIC HEART-FAILURE
A. Bergdahl et al., MODULATION OF VASCULAR CONTRACTILE RESPONSES TO ALPHA(1)-ADRENERGIC AND ALPHA(2)-ADRENERGIC AND NEUROPEPTIDE-Y RECEPTOR STIMULATION IN RATSWITH ISCHEMIC HEART-FAILURE, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 154(4), 1995, pp. 429-437
In order to evaluate adaptational changes in vascular function in cong
estive heart failure (CHF), we studied the contractile responses of is
olated arterial and venous blood vessels from rats suffering from CHF
induced by coronary artery ligature, resulting in a myocardial infarct
ion. The contractile responses of the basilar, femoral and renal arter
ies and of the iliac vein were examined in relation to adrenergic and
neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor function by the action of the alpha(1),
agonist phenylephrine, the alpha(2), agonist clonidine and NPY. The co
ntractile force was measured (in mN) and in % of K+-induced contractio
n as well as pD(2) to each agonist. When stimulated by a 60 mM K+-buff
er solution, the femoral and renal arteries from CHF rats responded wi
th a stronger contraction (E(max); 9.4 +/- 0.6 and 9.8 +/- 0.6 mN) tha
n the corresponding Sham vessels 6.2 +/- 0.7 and 5.6 +/- 0.4 mN respec
tively, P < 0.001). On the contrary, the iliac vein of CHF responded l
ess to K+ than the Sham iliac vein (E(max) 2.5 +/- 0.2 and 3.7 +/- 0.5
mN, P < 0.01). The CHF iliac vein responded with a weaker contraction
when stimulated with phenylephrine (E(max) 1.9 +/- 0.4 mN) and showed
a lower sensitivity (pD(2) 5.6 +/- 0.1) than the corresponding sham v
essel (E(max) 5.7 +/- 2.3 mN and pD(2) 6.3 +/- 0.5, P < 0.05). The CHF
renal artery was less sensitive to clonidine (pD(2) 6.4 +/- 0.6) than
the Sham renal artery (pD(2) 7.2 +/- 0.1, P < 0.05). The results indi
cate differences between CHF and Sham vessel segments according to bot
h contractile capacity induced by K+-depolarization and to agonist ind
uced contractile capacity and sensitivity. The differences are not of
general nature but vary according to the vascular bed examined.