The allometry of bark thickness was estimated both from thickness data
taken with a bark gauge only on ridges and from cross-sectional area
data based on a contour of the outside bark-surface, together with an
estimate of the inside bark-boundary. Three alternatives of the contou
r method are presented; they differ in how the outside bark-contour is
obtained, in how the inside bark-boundary is estimated and in invasiv
eness. Unlike the contour method alternative (CM2) with equivalently l
ow invasiveness, the bark gauge method significantly overestimated mea
n bark thickness and overestimated it more for larger individuals. Bec
ause the bark gauge method led to significantly and inconsistently hig
her allometric coefficients than the contour method, the contour metho
d is more appropriate for comparative and ecological studies of bark a
llometry.