I. Jungner et al., LIPOPROTEIN(A) - LEVELS IN A SWEDISH POPULATION IN RELATION TO OTHER LIPID PARAMETERS AND IN COMPARISON WITH A MALE SRI-LANKAN POPULATION, Clinical biochemistry, 28(4), 1995, pp. 427-434
Objective: To evaluate differences in Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentr
ations between a Swedish and Sri Lankan population. Methods: The distr
ibution of Lp(a) and its relation to other lipid parameters, measured
with an automated turbidimetric method, in 4646 Swedes (1944 females a
nd 2702 males) undergoing health screening and 757 randomly selected S
ri Lankan males (667 non-CHD and 80 CHD subjects) was evaluated. Resul
ts: The distribution was highly skewed towards low values in both the
Swedish population and the Sri Lankan male population. The Swedish pop
ulation had a median of 0.16 g/L (reported as total mass) whereas the
Sri Lankan population median of 0.06 g/L was much lower. For the Swede
s, there was a small significant difference of 0.03 g/L between the se
xes (F < M; p < 0.001) and Lp(a) was significantly higher in subjects
>50 years of age in both sexes (p < 0.002(F); p < 0.02(M)). 29% had Lp
(a) values >0.30 g/L. In the Sri Lankan males population Lp(a) was als
o significantly higher in subjects >50 years of age (p < 0.009) but on
ly 7% had an Lp(a) concentration of >0.30 g/L. In the CHD subgroup, th
ough not significant, subjects >50 years of age had a lower Lp(a) conc
entration, indicating that Lp(a) may be a more significant risk factor
in younger subjects. Both the Swedish female and male hypercholestero
lemic subgroups had significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations than nor
molipemic subgroups and the male hypertriglyceridemic subgroups signif
icantly lower Lp(a) concentrations than normolipemic. Great difference
s in Lp(a) levels are thus found between the two populations. The diff
erences are similar in normolipemic subjects and probably they reflect
mainly genetic differences. Lipid/lipoprotein concentrations were als
o found to differ. It is being investigated ii this reflects differenc
es in CHD prevalence. Conclusion: Our data support the importance of i
ncluding Lp(a) measurements when assessing the risk profile for premat
ure development of CHD in the individual patient.