This paper examines the equity characteristics of health care financin
g and delivery in Australia and compares its performance with recent f
indings on systems in Europe and the United States. Vertical equity of
finance is evaluated with income and payment concentration indices de
rived from published survey data on taxes and expenditure by income de
cile. Horizontal equity of health care delivery is assessed with stand
ardized expenditure concentration coefficients for three measures of h
ealth status and four types of health services, derived from household
survey data on health care utilization, health status, income and dem
ographics. Health cover is available to the entire population. Results
show the financing system is slightly progressive despite the fact th
at 30% of payment comes from private sources, which are regressive. Th
e equity index compares favorably to many European countries and is mu
ch better than the U.S. which has a regressive financing system. The A
ustralian system fares less well in terms of equity of health care del
ivery. Several features favor privately insured higher income persons
in use of health care and this is reflected, for some health status me
asures and types of service, in inequity favoring the better off. This
contrasts with inequity favoring the less well off in many European c
ountries and the U.S. This analysis provides a benchmark for monitorin
g the equity of the Australian system and provides information on the
equity of a mixed private and public financing system that covers the
entire population. This is relevant to the U.S. which is moving in thi
s direction by extending private cover to the uninsured and to Europea
n countries that are increasing private sector involvement in health c
are financing.