I. Kato et al., INTEROBSERVER VARIATION IN CYTOLOGICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSES OF CERVICAL NEOPLASIA AND ITS EPIDEMIOLOGIC IMPLICATION, Journal of clinical epidemiology, 48(9), 1995, pp. 1167-1174
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Medicine, General & Internal
Inter-observer variation in cytohistological diagnosis was assessed fo
r 1506 cervical smears and 883 histological slides from four case-cont
rol studies on cervical neoplasia. The kappa statistic among a panel o
f three cytopathologists was highest for diagnosis of invasive cancer
(0.70 for cytology and 0.74 for histology), followed by normal/inflamm
atory in cytology (0.68) and CIN III in histology (0.58). There was al
so nearly perfect agreement between the final panel diagnoses and the
original diagnoses made by local cytopathologists, except for those of
CIN III. Inter-observer variation in diagnosis for CIN III was invers
ely associated with age, number of children (in histology) and sexual
activity (in cytology). However, the odds ratios for CIN III calculate
d by each cytopathologist's diagnosis were not different from each oth
er for any etiologic factor. These results indicate that the diagnoses
of invasive cancer and of normal/inflammatory changes are highly repr
oducible and that the inter-observer variation does not have much impa
ct on the etiologic risk estimates.