A RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TAMOXIFEN ALONE VERSUS TAMOXIFEN PLUS MELATONININ ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE HEAVILY PRETREATED METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
P. Lissoni et al., A RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TAMOXIFEN ALONE VERSUS TAMOXIFEN PLUS MELATONININ ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE HEAVILY PRETREATED METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS, Oncology Reports, 2(5), 1995, pp. 871-873
Recent experiments suggest the possibility of modulating the efficacy
of cancer endocrine therapy by the pineal hormone melatonin (MLT). In
particular, it has been demonstrated that MLT may stimulate estrogen r
eceptor (ER) expression and enhance tamoxifen (TMX) effects other than
the antiestrogenic action. Therefore, MLT could amplify the efficacy
of TMX also in patients with negative ER. On this basis, a randomized
study was performed with TMX versus TMX plus MLT in ER-negative metast
atic breast cancer patients, who were unable to tolerate further chemo
therapy, because of age, low performance status and/or heavy chemother
apeutic pretreatment. The study included 40 ER-negative post-menopausa
l, metastatic breast cancer patients, who were randomized to receive T
MX alone (20 mg/day orally) or TMX plus MLT (20 mg/day orally in the e
vening). No complete response was seen. Partial response rate was sign
ificantly higher in patients treated with TMX and MLT than in those, w
ho received TMX alone (7/19 vs 2/21, p<0.05). Moreover, the percent of
survival at 1 year was significantly higher in patients treated with
TMX plus MLT than in those treated with TMX alone (12/19 vs 5/21, p<0.
01). No MLT-related toxicity was observed; on the contrary, most patie
nts receiving MLT experienced a relief of anxiety and of depression. T
his preliminary study suggests that the association of the pineal horm
one MLT may make TMX effective also in ER-negative metastatic breast c
ancer patients.