Because of the clinical and experimental utility of continuous finger
blood pressure measurements and the need for accuracy, we tested the p
erformance of a new hydraulic device in 22 consecutive hypertensive su
bjects during physiological and pharmacological interventions. Ipsilat
eral brachial intra-arterial pressure was monitored during rest, Valsa
lva's maneuver, static handgrip, and mental arithmetic and after subli
ngual glyceryl trinitrate. In excess of 40 000 blood pressure values w
ere analyzed. Average bias (intra-arterial minus finger blood pressure
) was 8.2+/-17.0 mm Hg (mean+/-SD, P=NS) for systolic and 2.8+/-10.4 m
m Hg (P=NS) for diastolic pressure. Two-way ANOVA of biases with subje
ct and task factors showed a subject effect (P<.001). Intersubject and
intrasubject standard deviations of bias were 13.8 and 9.8 mm Hg syst
olic and 8.7 and 5.7 diastolic, respectively. Linear drift (millimeter
s of mercury per minute) of finger pressure was greater (P<.001) for s
ystolic than diastolic pressure during static exercise and math and af
ter glyceryl trinitrate. Coefficients of determination for blood press
ure ranged from 0.4+/-0.3 to 0.8+/-0.3 during the tasks. We conclude t
hat (1) noninvasive finger blood pressure faithfully follows intra-art
erial changes but with clinically relevant offsets, (2) this technique
is best suited for assessing pressure changes, (3) physiological and
pharmacological interventions do not consistently affect finger pressu
re accuracy, (4) many reports of finger blood pressure measuring devic
es are based on direct readings obtained with inadequate system respon
se characteristics, and (5) the tested instrument falls short of the s
tandards requirements (bias less than or equal to 5+/-8 mm Hg) for dev
ices that measure intermittently.