Jp. Swaddle et Ic. Cuthill, ASYMMETRY AND HUMAN FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS - SYMMETRY MAY NOT ALWAYS BE BEAUTIFUL, Proceedings - Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 261(1360), 1995, pp. 111-116
It has been postulated that levels of fluctuating asymmetry in human f
aces may be negatively related to components of fitness such as parasi
te-resistance; hence potential mates with low levels of asymmetry may
appear more attractive. However, previous investigations of the relati
onship between asymmetry and facial attractiveness have confounded man
ipulations of asymmetry with facial 'averageness' and mean trait size.
In this experiment we performed a manipulation that altered asymmetry
within a face without altering the mean size of facial features. Thes
e faces were then rated on attractiveness. Contrary to what was predic
ted, faces that were made more symmetrical were perceived as being les
s attractive. These results do not support the hypothesis that attract
iveness is related to low levels of fluctuating asymmetry. The observe
d positive relationship between asymmetry and facial attractiveness ma
y be because certain facial features (including those contributing to
attractiveness) in fact show directional asymmetry or antisymmetry. Ou
r manipulations thus render naturally asymmetric features symmetrical.
This may make symmetric faces less attractive because of the reductio
n of natural directional asymmetries, perhaps making the faces appear
unemotional. The role of fluctuating asymmetries alone in assessments
of facial beauty is still unknown, although this experiment suggests f
luctuating asymmetry is relatively unimportant compared with direction
al asymmetry.