A cross-sectional study of chicken catchers was carried out by persona
l sampling of air contaminants. The catchers used either the drawer me
thod (DM) or truck method (TM) for loading chickens into cages. DM cat
chers were exposed to higher concentrations of hazardous substances th
an TM catchers, except for ammonia. In terms of geometric means total
dust concentrations were 11.3 mg/m(3) (DM catchers) and 8.1 mg/m(3) (T
M catchers). Full-shift dust exposure exceeded the Danish occupational
exposure limit (OEL) of 3 mg/m(3) for organic dust by at least a fact
or of 2. From paired personal sampling data the concentration of respi
rable dust ranged from 18% to 28% of the total dust concentration. The
average exposure level to bacterial endotoxin in total dust at 82 ng/
m(3) for DM catchers and 42 ng/m(3) for TM catchers exceeded a limit o
f 10 ng/m(3) recommended for poultry processing industry workers in th
e United Stares. Endotoxin content of airborne dust averaged 6.5 +/- 4
.9 ng/mg. Exposure to microorganisms was determined by microscopy (tot
al count) and by culturing (viable count). The geometric means for tot
al count (microorganisms/m(3)) were 7.0 X 10(8) (DM catchers) and 4.9
X 10(8) (TM catchers) and for viable count 3.2 X 10(7) cfu/m(3) (DM ca
tchers) and 1.4 X 10(7) cfu/m(3) (TM catchers). The ratio of microorga
nisms counted by microscopy to levels of viable microorganisms ranged
from 5 to 200, implying a strong underestimation of exposure levels fr
om viable counts alone. It was concluded that Danish chicken catchers
were exposed beyond recommended limits for the air contaminants evalua
ted. Details in chicken-catching technique may affect exposure to air
contaminants, and development of preventive measures is recommended.