RECURRENT STROKE AFTER TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK OR MINOR ISCHEMIC STROKE - DOES THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN SMALL AND LARGE VESSEL DISEASE REMAIN TRUE TO TYPE
Lj. Kappelle et al., RECURRENT STROKE AFTER TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK OR MINOR ISCHEMIC STROKE - DOES THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN SMALL AND LARGE VESSEL DISEASE REMAIN TRUE TO TYPE, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 59(2), 1995, pp. 127-131
The incidence and vascular type of recurrent ischaemic stroke was stud
ied in patients with supratentorial transient ischaemic attacks or non
-disabling ischaemic strokes, who were treated with aspirin (30 or 283
mg). Patients were divided into groups with small vessel disease (SVD
) (n = 1216) or large vessel disease (LVD) (n = 1221) on the grounds o
f their clinical features and CT at baseline. Patients with evidence o
f both SVD and LVD (n = 180) were excluded from further analyses. Duri
ng follow up (mean 2.6 years) annual stroke rate was 3.6% in both grou
ps. Of the 107 patients with SVD at baseline who had recurrent strokes
, 83 proved to have an identifiable infarct: 30 (28%) again had a smal
l vessel infarct, 39 (36%) had a large vessel ischaemic stroke and in
14 (13%) the recurrent ischaemic stroke was in the posterior fossa. Of
the 110 patients with LVD at baseline and recurrent stroke, 91 had an
identifiable infarct: 67 (61%) again had a large vessel ischaemic str
oke, 16 (15%) had a small vessel ischaemic stroke, and eight (7%) had
the recurrent ischaemic stroke in the posterior fossa. Thus patients w
ith a transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke cau
sed by LVD were more likely to have an ischaemic stroke of the same ve
ssel type during follow up than patients with SVD (relative risk 2.2;
95% confidence interval 1.5-3.4). Possible explanations for this diffe
rence are: (1) patients with a small vessel ischaemic stroke at baseli
ne had both SVD and LVD or were misdiagnosed; (2) recurrent small vess
el ischaemic strokes may have occurred more often than reported, becau
se they were silent or only minimally disabling; (3) recurrent large v
essel ischaemic strokes occurring in patients initially diagnosed as h
aving SVD might have been related to potential cardiac sources of embo
li that had not been previously recognised; (4) the antiplatelet drug
aspirin (30 or 283 mg) prescribed in this patient group may have preve
nted thrombosis in small vessels better than in large vessels.