There are few well-controlled studies of the clinical efficacy of fibr
in sealant, defined by lives saved or reduced need for blood transfusi
ons. Evaluation of fibrin sealant in trauma situations, e.g. liver lac
eration, has been difficult to perform. Only recently has fibrin seala
nt been actively promoted by US manufacturers as a commercially valuab
le alternative to the relatively inexpensive crude bovine thrombin and
cryoprecipitate that are in current use. Regulatory agencies and manu
facturers are aware that patients in the USA are receiving a suboptima
l form of fibrin glue since cryoprecipitate is not virally inactivated
and has a variable fibrinogen concentration. In addition, bovine thro
mbin is not regulated with respect to factor V content or any other im
purities. During the past year regulatory agencies, together with manu
facturers and clinicians, have begun to define clinically valid endpoi
nts for efficacy of a commercially prepared fibrin sealant. These may
include improvement in hemostasis compared with a placebo or agents co
nsidered to be 'standard of care'. Thus, the regulatory agencies may b
e willing to consider studies in animals that demonstrate efficacy as
well as surrogate endpoints, such as reduced factor concentrate requir
ements in patients with severe hemophilia requiring dental extraction.
As fibrin sealant becomes available in a liquid and potentially in a
bandage form, it may also become an essential matrix for recombinant f
actors that can affect endothelial function.