TREATMENT OF ANGINA-PECTORIS IN THE COMMUNITY - IS MEDICAL THERAPY GIVEN A CHANCE

Citation
F. Kee et al., TREATMENT OF ANGINA-PECTORIS IN THE COMMUNITY - IS MEDICAL THERAPY GIVEN A CHANCE, Public health, 109(4), 1995, pp. 259-266
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
00333506
Volume
109
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
259 - 266
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-3506(1995)109:4<259:TOAITC>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Objective: To describe the routine management of patients with chronic stable angina by GPs in Northern Ireland and the factors which they p erceived affected the success of medical therapy. Design: A questionna ire survey of all general practitioners in Northern Ireland (n = 962). Setting: A survey conducted collaboratively by the Departments of Pub lic Health Medicine in each of the four Health Boards in the province. Total population served, 1.5 million. Main outcome measures: The rela tionship between the perceived reasons for medical treatment failure a nd the stated referral and prescribing practice of the GPs. Results: A total of 541 Gps replied; the response rate was 56%. The two most imp ortant reasons given for the perceived failure of medical therapy were (i) underlying disease progression and (ii) an adverse patient lifest yle such as smoking or obesity (cited as of primary importance by (i) 264 and (ii) 225 doctors respectively). The ranking differed significa ntly according to the doctor's propensity to prescribe triple therapy, with those doctors in the highest tertile of this distribution being less likely to cite the patient's lifestyle as a primary reason for tr eatment failure (chi-squared=6.7, d.f.=2, P=0.035) and more likely to cite underlying disease progression as a primary reason (chi-square=7. 0, d.f.=2, p=0.031). The overall ranking of the primary reasons for re ferral differed significantly according to the proportion of patients given a trial of triple therapy and to the doctor's propensity to refe r. Doctors who had given a greater proportion of their patients at lea st a trial of triple therapy (in the highest tertile of the distributi on) were more likely to cite the need for revascularisation assessment as the primary reason (chi-square=12.5, d.f.=2, P=0.0019). On the oth er hand, the need for further advice on medical therapy was generally ranked higher by those doctors who had given fewer of their patients a t least a trial of triple therapy (chi-square=7.3, d.f.=2, P=0.027). G Ps who had referred fewer of their new patients to hospital were more likely to be those doctors with fewer patients given at least a trial of triple therapy. Doctors with a greater percentage of their patients managed primarily by a hospital specialist tended to have more who ha d had a trial of triple therapy for their symptoms. Conclusions: The r esults suggest the need for clearer definition for GPs of the place of revascularisation and of medical therapy for patients with stable ang ina.