Traditionally, in the literature on the modelling of decision aids one
notes the propensity to treat expected utility models and outranking
relation models as rivals. It may be possible, however, to benefit fro
m the use of both approaches in a risky decision context. Stochastic d
ominance conditions can be used to establish, for each criterion, the
preferences of a decision maker and to characterise them by a concave
or convex utility function. Two levels of complexity in preference eli
citation, designated as clear and unclear, are distinguished. Only in
the case of unclear preferences is it potentially interesting to attem
pt to estimate the value function of the decision maker, thus obtainin
g his (her) preferences with a reduced number of questions. The number
of questions that must be asked of the decision maker depends upon th
e level of the concordance threshold that he(she) requires in the cons
truction of the outranking relations using the ELECTRE method.