CHANGING TRENDS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOMETRIOSIS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF WOMEN WITH PELVIC ENDOMETRIOSIS PRESENTING WITH CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN OR INFERTILITY
Wp. Dmowski et al., CHANGING TRENDS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOMETRIOSIS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF WOMEN WITH PELVIC ENDOMETRIOSIS PRESENTING WITH CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN OR INFERTILITY, Fertility and sterility, 67(2), 1997, pp. 238-243
Objective: To compare demographic, epidemiologic, and medical data and
to evaluate diagnostic trends in women with endometriosis and chronic
pelvic pain symptoms or endometriosis and infertility. Design: Retros
pective analysis. Setting: Institute for the Study and Treatment of En
dometriosis. Patient(s): Six hundred ninety-three consecutive patients
with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain (n = 357) or endometriosis
and infertility (n = 336). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measur
e(s): Demographic and epidemiologic parameters, diagnostic trends. Res
ult(s): Women with pelvic symptoms were younger, had less formal educa
tion, more frequent family history, and higher frequency and intensity
of pelvic complaints. Mean ages at first symptom and diagnosis were l
ower in the pain group, but stage of endometriosis at first diagnosis
was more advanced. The mean ''diagnostic delay'' was longer in the pel
vic pain than in the infertile group (6.35 versus 3.13 years), but it
decreased during three consecutive 5-year intervals in both groups, an
d there was also a gradual decrease in the frequency of advanced endom
etriosis at; the time of first diagnosis. Conclusion(s): Demographic a
nd epidemiologic parameters in women with endometriosis differ, depend
ing whether chronic pelvic pain or infertility are the presenting symp
toms. In the pain group, diagnostic delay is longer and endometriosis
at diagnostic laparoscopy more advanced, indicating progressiveness of
the disease. During the last 15 years, diagnostic delay steadily of c
lined.