M. Schemmel et al., COMPARISON OF THE ULTRASONIC SCALPEL TO CO2-LASER AND ELECTROSURGERY IN TERMS OF TISSUE-INJURY AND ADHESION FORMATION IN A RABBIT MODEL, Fertility and sterility, 67(2), 1997, pp. 382-386
Objective: To determine the relative effect of an ultrasonic scalpel o
n reproductive tissue compared with CO2 laser and electrosurgery. Desi
gn: Prospective, randomized animal study. Setting: University laborato
ry setting. Animals: Sixteen New Zealand White rabbits. Intervention(s
): A steel scalpel, an ultrasonic scalpel, a CO2 laser, or electrosurg
ery were used to perform an ovarian wedge resection and to remove the
distal uterine horn. A 3-cm longitudinal incision also was made in the
uterine horn. Main Outcome Measure(s): The number of 1-second bursts
of needle-tip electrosurgery required for hemostasis, the depth and de
gree of coagulation necrosis, degree of fibrin deposition, and postope
rative adhesion formation. Result(s): The amount of electrosurgery nee
ded to achieve hemostasis was less for any of the four power technique
s than for the steel scalpel, with the exception of the ultrasonic sca
lpel at level 5 when used on the ovary. The depth (range: 0.30 to 0.38
mm) and the degree of coagulation necrosis was not different for ally
of the power techniques. The fibrin score was greatest for the ultras
onic scalpel at level 5 in both the ovarian tissue and the uterine tis
sue. There was no difference in adhesion scores for the power techniqu
es and the steel scalpel. Conclusion(s): The ultrasonic scalpel at lev
el 3 is not different from either CO laser or electrosurgery in terms
of hemostatic properties, coagulation necrosis, or adhesion formation
in the rabbit model.