A. Majnemer et Mi. Shevell, DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF THE NEUROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DELAYED CHILD, The Journal of pediatrics, 127(2), 1995, pp. 193-199
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the etiologic yield
of the neurologic assessment of a consecutive cohort of developmentall
y delayed children. Study design: A retrospective chart review was car
ried out on all patients referred to a single university-based pediatr
ic neurologist for evaluation of global developmental delay from July
1991 to December 1993. Patients referred because of isolated speech or
motor delay or autism or those who had been previously evaluated by a
nother neurologist were excluded. Results: A total of 77 patients were
identified; 47 were male, and 62 were referred by a pediatrician. Neu
rologic evaluation did not confirm global delay in 10, and 8 did not c
omplete diagnostic evaluation; one child was included in both groups.
Of the remaining 60, an etiologic diagnosis was suspected by the refer
ring physician at the time of referral in 13. Although parents suspect
ed a delay at a mean age of 0.66 (+/-0.69) year, children were examine
d by the neurologist at a mean age of 3.58 (+/-2.42) years. Twenty-fiv
e were mildly delayed, 23 were moderately delayed, and 12 were severel
y delayed. Diagnostic studies (history, physical examination, and sele
cted investigations, including screens for metabolic disease, karyotyp
e, fragile X testing, electroencephalography, and neuroimaging) yielde
d an etiologic diagnosis in 38 (63.3%) of the 60 patients. Etiologic c
ategories included cerebral dysgenesis (16.7%), hypoxic-ischemic encep
halopathy (10.0%), chromosomal abnormalities (10%), toxins (8.3%), met
abolic disorders (5.0%), and neurocutaneous (3.3%), neuromuscular (3.3
%), genetic/dysmorphic (3.3%), and epileptic (3.3%) syndromes. Etiolog
ic yield was equivalent across categories and degree of developmental
delay. Conclusion: Referral to a pediatric neurologist and application
of a selected battery of investigations yield etiologic findings with
important implications with respect to management, prognosis, and rec
urrence risk estimate in a significant portion of globally delayed chi
ldren.