Dj. Bagnall et al., FLOWERING RESPONSES TO ALTERED EXPRESSION OF PHYTOCHROME IN MUTANTS AND TRANSGENIC LINES OF ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA (L) HEYNH, Plant physiology, 108(4), 1995, pp. 1495-1503
The long-day plant Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. flowers early in r
esponse to brief end-of-day (EOD) exposures to far-red light (FR) foll
owing a fluorescent short day of 8 h. FR promotion of flowering was nu
llified by subsequent brief red light (R) EOD exposure, indicating phy
tochrome involvement. The EOD response to R or FR is a robust measure
of phytochrome action. Along with their wild-type (WT) parents, mutant
s deficient in either phytochrome A or and responded similarly to the
EOD treatments. Thus, neither phytochrome A nor B exclusively regulate
d flowering, although phytochrome B controlled hypocotyl elongation. P
erhaps a third phytochrome species is important for the EOD responses
of the mutants and/or their flowering is regulated by the amount of th
e FR-absorbing form of phytochrome, irrespective of the phytochrome sp
ecies. Overexpression of phytochrome A or phytochrome 8 resulted in di
ffering photoperiod and EOD responses among the genotypes. The day-neu
tral overexpressor of phytochrome A had an EOD response similar to all
of the mutants and WTs, whereas R EOD exposure promoted flowering in
the overexpressor of phytochrome and and FR EOD exposure inhibited thi
s promotion. The comparisons between relative flowering times and leaf
numbers at flowering of the overexpressors and their WTs were not con
sistent across photoperiods and light treatments, although both phytoc
hromes A and B contributed to regulating flowering of the transgenic p
lants.