Hp. Dai et Ba. Wright, DETECTING SIGNALS OF UNEXPECTED OR UNCERTAIN DURATIONS, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(2), 1995, pp. 798-806
Expectation of signal duration influences the signal detectability. Th
is is demonstrated in two experiments in which percent correct was mea
sured for both tonal and noise signals whose durations were either une
xpected or uncertain. In both experiments, the signal at each duration
was set to have a d' of about 1.5 when that duration was presented al
one and expected. When the six subjects were led to expect a short- or
a long-duration signal using the probe-signal method, the detectabili
ty of signals decreased to near chance as the signal duration deviated
from the expected value (experiment 1). When the subjects were led to
expect a range of durations, the detectability was only slightly wors
e than when each signal was presented alone (experiment 2). Those resu
lts suggest that listeners adjust their temporal-integration intervals
according to the demand of the specific task. Finally, the results ob
tained with the noise signal were analyzed using the multiple-look mod
el and a modified energy-detector model. Assuming that the integration
interval is matched to the expected signal duration, both models pred
ict the detection of signals having unexpected durations reasonably we
ll. Both models, however, fail to predict the small effect of duration
uncertainty. (C) 1995 Acoustical Society of America.