Variation in the nutritive value of barley is well documented. Althoug
h bulk density is a convenient means of evaluating barley, it does not
fully account for differences observed in animal performance from fee
ding different sources of barley. Recent data indicate that starch and
(or) fiber content may be more reliable criteria for evaluating sourc
es of barley. As progress has been made toward higher starch content a
nd plumper barley, greater attention should be given to proper process
ing of barley before feeding. Improper processing might well negate po
tential improvements expected from higher-quality barley.