This review is based on many publications from the US and some from th
e former Soviet Union. It briefly describes the sources of lunar dust.
The problems posed to the past Apollo missions are summarized. The ph
ysical properties of lunar soils, such as cohesion, angle of repose, a
ngle of friction, and bearing capacity, as reported by scientists from
these two nations, are compared. The composition of lunar soils is de
scribed in terms of acidic and basic components. Since lunar soils are
mainly silicates, we are the first to point out the importance of the
Lewis acid-base interaction to the cohesion and adhesion of lunar dus
t. The adhesion of lunar dust is similar to that of a xerographic deve
loper. For the adhesion between lunar dust and dissimilar materials, b
oth van der Waals and electrostatic interactions can be the driving fo
rce, depending on the size of the dust particles. For particles smalle
r than 50 mu m, van der Waals interaction predominates, while for thos
e larger than 50 mu m, electrostatic interaction controls. For the ele
ctrostatic interaction, lunar dust should charge positively. If lunar
dust is pre-charged, e.g, by solar wind, the electrostatic interaction
should predominate regardless of the size of the particles. It is imp
ortant to note that for the electrostatic interaction, both electronic
and ionic mechanisms can influence charge exchange. Thus, the Lewis t
ype acid-base interaction can also affect the charge exchange. Experim
ental work with a simulated lunar dust is recommended for the elucidat
ion of the adhesion and cohesion mechanisms. Before that, all methods
of control of lunar dust are, at best, speculative.