The purpose of this article is to develop a theory, rooted in social p
sychology, that explains the nuclear nonproliferation regime. I posit
that the regime evolved to serve the interests of a group of establish
ed liberal democracies that self-consciously identify their security i
nterests collectively on the basis of shared core values and a history
of cooperation. The United States acts as principal guardian of the r
egime. This role stems from its role as the principal defender of libe
ral democracy during the Cold War. The self-identification of the libe
ral group of states biases their perception of and reaction to threats
to the regime in their own favor. I support this claim by comparing r
esponses to violations and perceived violations of the regime by membe
rs and nonmembers of the group. Findings indicate a strong bias in fav
or of the liberal group.