CONTRACTILE PROPERTIES OF THE TONGUE MUSCLES - EFFECTS OF HYPOGLOSSALNERVE AND EXTRACELLULAR MOTONEURON STIMULATION IN RAT

Citation
Ee. Gilliam et Sj. Goldberg, CONTRACTILE PROPERTIES OF THE TONGUE MUSCLES - EFFECTS OF HYPOGLOSSALNERVE AND EXTRACELLULAR MOTONEURON STIMULATION IN RAT, Journal of neurophysiology, 74(2), 1995, pp. 547-555
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Physiology,Neurosciences,Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223077
Volume
74
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
547 - 555
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3077(1995)74:2<547:CPOTTM>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
1. Stimulation of the whole hypoglossal (XIIth) nerve or its medial or lateral branch in the rat produced two major movements of the tongue as measured with a single force transducer attached to the tip of the tongue. Stimulation of the whole XIIth nerve or the lateral branch pro duced a retrusion of the tongue, whereas stimulation of the medial bra nch produced a protrusion. 2. The average retrusive twitch tension evo ked by stimulation of the XIIth nerve (11.25 g) or the lateral branch (12.02 g) was significantly greater (P less than or equal to 0.0001) t han the protrusive twitch tension (1.05 g) elicited by medial branch s timulation. The tetanic tension produced by lateral branch stimulation (36.82 g) was significantly greater (P less than or equal to 0.007) t han the whole nerve tetanic tension (28.23 g). The greater tension eli cited by stimulation of the lateral branch of the nerve when compared with the tension elicited by stimulation of the whole XIIth nerve was probably due to the absence of protrusive axons in the lateral branch of the nerve. Stimulation of the whole XIIth nerve activates axons inn ervating both protrusive and retrusive muscles, resulting in a weaker net retrusive force. 3. The contraction time of the tongue in response to medial branch stimulation (10.94 ms) was significantly faster than when the whole XIIth nerve (15.68 ms, P less than or equal to 0.007) or lateral branch (13.36 ms, P less than or equal to 0.05) was stimula ted. The twitch contraction time of the tongue in response to whole XI Ith nerve or lateral branch stimulation was not significantly differen t. 4. The tongue appears to be generally fatigue resistant in response to stimulation of the whole XIIth nerve [fatigue index (FI) of 0.67], the lateral nerve branch (FI of 0.67), and the medial nerve branch (F I of 0.76). 5. Extracellular stimulation of motoneurons within the XII th nucleus elicited protrusive or retrusive movements with the medial branch of the nerve intact. Protrusive movements were evoked by stimul ation at sites generally ventral in the nucleus, but rostral to the ob ex only, and were thought to be caused by genioglossus motoneurons. Th e average protrusive twitch tension elicited was 47.1 mg with a 16.0-m s twitch contraction time and an Fl of 1.1. Retrusive movements were e voked by stimulation at sites throughout the length of the XIIth nucle us, generally ventrally, and were thought to be caused by intrinsic mu scle motoneurons. The average retrusive twitch tension was 67.1 mg wit h a 18.5-ms twitch contraction time and an Fl of 0.97. The difference in the evoked protrusive and retrusive twitch tension was significant (P less than or equal to 0.0001). 6. Extracellular stimulation of moto neurons within the XIIth nucleus elicited only retrusion with the late ral branch of the nerve intact. This retrusion was elicited from nucle ar stimulation sites generally dorsal in the nucleus, but primarily ro stral to the obex, and was presumed to be caused by styloglossus/hyogl ossus motoneurons. The average retrusive twitch tension was 86.0 mg wi th a 13.5-ms twitch contraction time and an FI of 1.4. This stylogloss us/hyoglossus-motorneuron-evoked twitch tension was significantly stro nger than that elicited by stimulation of presumed genioglossus (P les s than or equal to 0.0001) or intrinsic (P less than or equal to 0.000 1) motoneurons. The styloglossus/hyglossus-elicited twitch contraction time was significantly faster than that elicited by stimulation of ge nioglossus (p less than or equal to 0.01) or intrinsic (P less than or equal to 0.0001) motoneurons. 7. The FIs in response to extracellular motoneuron stimulation were generally higher than those seen in respo nse to whole nerve or nerve branch stimulation.