The present knowledge of karyological characters, including basic numb
ers, ploidy levels, chromosome structures, karyotypes, interphase nucl
ear types, and DNA contents, and the broad range of variation for most
of these characters within Rubiaceae (excluding Rubieae) are summariz
ed. These data are related to the presently existing systematic concep
ts of the family. The use of karyological characters is exemplified in
some taxonomically critical groups: Subfamily Antirheoideae sensu Rob
brecht appears heterogeneous with regard to basic numbers and chromoso
me structure; it contains chromosomally homogeneous tribes (e.g., Vang
uerieae or Guettardeae), but also groups with internal variation (such
as the tribe Knoxieae or the genus Chiococca). Available chromosome d
ata of the tribe Cinchoneae sensu Robbrecht seem to be in accordance w
ith its morphologically and molecular-based subdivision in three tribe
s: viz. Cinchoneae s. str., Calycophylleae, and Coptosapelteae. The tr
ibe Chiococceae sensu Bremer consists of at least two distinct entitie
s characterized by their chromosome morphology and basic numbers: the
former tribe Condamineeae, and the genera Chiococca and Exostema. A po
ssible subdivision of Rondeletia is indicated by three different basic
numbers (x = 9, x = 10, x = 11) occurring in the genus, while chromos
ome data give no hints regarding the position of Wendlandia and Sipane
a in the tribe Rondeletieae. The tribe Isertieae comprises genera with
basic numbers of x = 9, x = 10, and x = 11. Thus the tribal position
of Acranthera (x = 10), Heinsia (x = 11), and Mycetia (x = 11) cannot
be decided on the basis of chromosome numbers alone. Sabicea has taxa
with either x = 9 or x = 11; morphological studies are required to che
ck the generic delimitations. The close relationship of Panridiantha a
nd Urophyllum is supported by karyomorphology and basic number. A poss
ible origin of the Spermacoce out of the tribe Hedyotideae is discusse
d.