A COMPARISON OF DEMOGRAPHIC-VARIABLES, SYMPTOM PROFILES, AND MEASUREMENTS OF FUNCTIONING IN SYMPTOMATIC VOLUNTEERS AND AN OUTPATIENT CLINICAL POPULATION
Mh. Rapaport et al., A COMPARISON OF DEMOGRAPHIC-VARIABLES, SYMPTOM PROFILES, AND MEASUREMENTS OF FUNCTIONING IN SYMPTOMATIC VOLUNTEERS AND AN OUTPATIENT CLINICAL POPULATION, Psychopharmacology bulletin, 31(1), 1995, pp. 111-114
There is consistent concern about the generalizability of research fin
dings generated by clinical trials. There are several reasons for conc
ern about these findings: (1) most clinical trials involve symptomatic
volunteers who are recruited by means of advertisements rather than p
atients recruited from general clinical populations; (2) most clinical
trials have restrictive criteria for admission into the study; and (3
) the design of mast trials is not representative of prescribing pract
ices in the community, These methodological issues require investigato
rs to question whether re suits from trials adequately model what will
be seen in a general clinical situation. This report begins to evalua
te the representativeness of initial samples by studying the demograph
ic characteristics, symptom profiles, and measurements of functional d
isability for clinical outpatients and symptomatic volunteers recruite
d for clinical trials. We found that symptomatic volunteers were stati
stically more likely to be older than outpatients, were less likely to
be single, and reported using more alcohol and cigarettes than outpat
ients. The two groups had similar levels of functional impairment and
similar ages at onset of symptoms, but symptomatic volunteers reported
more symptoms of depression and anxiety than outpatients. However, we
believe the differences identified in this study did not seem to be c
linically significant.