A number of events in the 1970's and 1980's impacted the course of pro
cess safety. Incidents such as Flixborough, Seveso, Three-Mile Island,
and Bhopal are well known throughout industry and are recognized as e
xamples of major disasters. Even though events leading up to these dis
asters were completely different they had one common element between t
hem: a substance was released from a manufacturing unit, became airbor
ne and presented a hazard of such magnitude as to place the safety of
both employees and the surrounding public in jeopardy. As a result, in
dustry became increasingly concerned regarding potential loss, in huma
n and economic terms, as plants and equipment grew in size [1]. The Fl
ixborough incident raised the level of concern for process safety, par
ticularly in terms of the hazards presented by fire and explosion. Sev
eso and Three-Mile Island emphasized the need to consider far-field ex
posure. The Bhopal incident created an urgent need to recognize and un
derstand the expected downwind impact of potential releases of acutely
toxic substances to the air. In order to meet this need, the Dow Chem
ical Company, a recognized leader in the area of safety and loss preve
ntion, presented a Chemical Exposure Index in 1986. AlChE has recently
published an updated version entitled Dow's Chemical Exposure Index G
uide (first edition).